Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sumit Nagal vs Vitaliy Sachko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Sachko analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Vitaliy Sachko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 1 - 0 Sachko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 55.15% of points on their second serve, while Sachko has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 53.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sachko has won 49.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.13% and 32.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 63.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sachko has saved 59.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Sachko winning 51.85% (W/L 28/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sachko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as Sachko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nagal winning 1 times and Sachko being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nagal winning 2 and Sachko winning 1. The last match between Nagal and Sachko was at the Tulln Challenger, 07-09-2023, Second, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:46:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Sachko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nagal winning 1 times and Sachko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 1, and Sachko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.25 while Sachko has played against players with an average rank of 257.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sachko has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 46.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sachko has converted 41.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
95
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
195
Rank
156
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
60% (317-207)
Career Total W/L
58% (304-220)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$154,400
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:46:1 | 2:46:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (63/106) | 52% (48/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (44/63) | 77% (37/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (21/43) | 49% (22/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (34/93) | 39% (41/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
59%
(
63 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
1
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sumit Nagal | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (44/31) | 42% (14/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (380/332) | 49% (159/166) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:48 | 1:44:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 211.48 | 350.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1610/2290) | 62% (678/1089) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1071/1610) | 64% (435/678) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (375/680) | 49% (203/411) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (96/207) | 41% (45/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (891/2262) | 40% (412/1035) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (9/4) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (21/16) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (21/5) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
107
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Vitaliy Sachko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
65%
(
32 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Norbert Gombos
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Francesco Passaro
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Nagal Vs Sachko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
